The early morning queue outside the SASSA office in Khayelitsha, Cape Town, stretches for nearly half a kilometer. I arrive at 5:45 AM to find hundreds of people already waiting—mothers with babies strapped to their backs, elderly men leaning on canes, and young adults who would rather be searching for work but instead must spend precious hours securing their lifeline to survival.
“I’ve been here since 4 AM,” says Nomvula Mbeki, a 43-year-old mother of two who lost her cleaning job during the pandemic and hasn’t found stable work since. “When I heard about the extension on the radio yesterday, I came immediately to check if my application is still active. This grant is the difference between my children eating or going hungry.”
After years of uncertainty and repeated short-term extensions, the South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) has finally announced a significant extension of the Social Relief of Distress (SRD) grant until March 2026. The announcement brings both relief and new challenges for the approximately 8.5 million South Africans who depend on this modest but vital support of R370 per month.
This comprehensive analysis explores what the extension means for recipients, the new payment structure being implemented, and the broader implications for South Africa’s evolving social security system.
The Extension: Details and Significance
The SRD grant, initially introduced in May 2020 as a temporary six-month measure to provide relief during the COVID-19 pandemic, has now been extended multiple times. This latest extension, however, is the longest yet, providing a 24-month commitment that offers unprecedented stability for recipients.
Minister of Social Development Lindiwe Zulu made the announcement during a press briefing in Pretoria, emphasizing the government’s commitment to supporting vulnerable citizens while working toward more permanent solutions.
“The extension of the SRD grant until March 2026 reflects our understanding that economic recovery from the pandemic has been uneven and many South Africans continue to face severe hardship,” Zulu stated. “While we work toward the implementation of a more comprehensive social security framework, this extension provides a critical safety net for millions of citizens with no other means of support.”
The grant amount remains at R370 per month—an amount that, while far below South Africa’s food poverty line of approximately R780 per month, provides essential support for recipients with no other income. Government officials indicated that potential increases to the grant amount would be considered in future budget allocations, but no specific commitments were made.
For Thabo Nkosi, 35, whom I met in the SASSA queue, the extension represents desperately needed certainty. “Before, we never knew if the grant would continue from one month to the next. We lived in constant fear that it would suddenly stop,” he explains, shifting his weight from one foot to another as the line inches forward. “Now I can plan at least a little bit. I know that for the next two years, there will be something to help me survive while I keep looking for work.”
New Payment Dates and System
Along with the extension, SASSA has announced a restructured payment system designed to reduce system overloads and long queues that have plagued previous disbursements. Instead of processing all payments in the first week of the month, SASSA will now stagger payments according to the last three digits of recipients’ ID numbers.
The new payment schedule will be implemented as follows:
- ID numbers ending in 000–099: Payments on the 1st and 2nd of each month
- ID numbers ending in 100–199: Payments on the 3rd and 4th of each month
- ID numbers ending in 200–299: Payments on the 5th and 6th of each month
- ID numbers ending in 300–399: Payments on the 7th and 8th of each month
- ID numbers ending in 400–499: Payments on the 9th and 10th of each month
- ID numbers ending in 500–599: Payments on the 11th and 12th of each month
- ID numbers ending in 600–699: Payments on the 13th and 14th of each month
- ID numbers ending in 700–799: Payments on the 15th and 16th of each month
- ID numbers ending in 800–899: Payments on the 17th and 18th of each month
- ID numbers ending in 900–999: Payments on the 19th and 20th of each month
This staggered approach aims to reduce the system crashes and payment delays that have frequently occurred when all 8.5 million recipients attempted to access their grants simultaneously.
“The new payment schedule is designed to ensure more reliable disbursement and reduce the burden on both our systems and on recipients who previously had to make multiple attempts to access their funds,” explained SASSA CEO Busisiwe Memela-Khambula in a statement accompanying the announcement.
For recipients who receive their grants through bank transfers, funds should reflect in accounts on the specified days. Those collecting cash payments from retail partners (including Pick n Pay, Shoprite, Boxer, and Checkers) or the Post Office can do so on or after their designated days, provided they have received the SMS confirmation that their grant is ready for collection.
Joyce Sithole, a 52-year-old grandmother I spoke with outside the SASSA office, expressed mixed feelings about the new system. “It’s good that they’re trying to fix the payment problems, but for those of us who get paid later in the month, it means waiting longer for money we desperately need,” she notes. “When you have nothing, even a few more days of waiting is very difficult.”
Enhanced Verification Requirements
The extension comes with enhanced verification requirements that SASSA officials say are necessary to ensure the grant reaches only eligible recipients. This includes more frequent cross-checking against banking records, tax data, and other government databases.
Under the new framework, all recipients will need to confirm their eligibility every three months through a simple verification process. This can be completed through the SASSA SRD website, the dedicated WhatsApp line (082 046 8553), USSD service (1347737#), or in person at SASSA offices.
The enhanced verification has already raised concerns among advocacy groups who worry that technical barriers could exclude legitimate beneficiaries, particularly those with limited digital literacy or internet access.
“While we welcome the extension, we’re concerned about the potential for increased exclusion through complex verification processes,” says Thandiwe Zulu, advocacy coordinator at the Black Sash, a social justice organization that has closely monitored the SRD grant implementation. “Many grant recipients lack reliable internet access, struggle with digital interfaces, or cannot afford the data costs associated with online verification.”
During my visit to the SASSA office, these concerns were evident. I observed an elderly man receiving assistance from a younger woman to complete the verification process on her smartphone, as he didn’t own a phone capable of accessing the internet.
SASSA officials have acknowledged these challenges and promised additional support measures, including assistance at local SASSA offices and partnerships with community organizations to help recipients navigate the verification requirements.
“We understand that not all recipients have equal access to technology,” Memela-Khambula stated. “We are committed to ensuring that no eligible recipient loses their grant due to technical barriers.”
The Human Impact: Beyond the Numbers
While policy announcements and system changes dominate headlines, the true significance of the SRD grant extension lies in its impact on human lives. During my visits to communities in Cape Town, Johannesburg, and rural Eastern Cape over the past month, I’ve spoken with dozens of grant recipients about how this modest sum affects their daily existence.
For most recipients, the R370 primarily goes toward basic food items, with careful budgeting to maximize its value. Many have developed elaborate strategies to stretch their grants as far as possible.
Nolwazi Dlamini, a 48-year-old from Alexandra township in Johannesburg, explains her approach: “From the R370, I spend R200 on maize meal, beans, and oil – basic foods that can last. Another R100 goes to electricity. The remaining R70 I try to save for emergencies or school needs for my grandchildren, but often something urgent comes up before I can save anything.”
For younger recipients, the grant often serves as crucial support while they seek employment. Sipho Mbatha, 26, uses his grant to fund his job search: “Half goes to food, and the rest I use for transport to interviews and internet café costs to apply for jobs online. Without the grant, I couldn’t even look for work effectively.”
In rural areas, where food costs are often higher due to transport factors and employment opportunities scarcer, the grant takes on even greater importance. Nonkululeko Radebe from a small village in the Eastern Cape described pooling resources with neighbors: “Five of us contribute our grants together to buy in bulk from the monthly mobile market that comes to our area. We get better prices that way, and then share the food among our families.”
These stories highlight both the critical importance of the grant and its fundamental inadequacy. For most recipients, the R370 covers basic survival needs for only a portion of each month, requiring additional support from family networks, community associations, or sporadic informal work to survive.
Political Context and Future Implications
The decision to extend the SRD grant until March 2026 comes against a complex political backdrop. What began as a temporary emergency measure during the COVID-19 pandemic has evolved into a de facto permanent addition to South Africa’s social security system, though still without the statutory protections and guaranteed funding of established grants like the Child Support Grant or Old Age Pension.
The extension period is significant, carrying the grant beyond South Africa’s next general election, expected in 2024. This timing has led some political analysts to suggest that electoral considerations played a role in the decision.
“The SRD grant has become politically untouchable,” notes political analyst Sibusiso Ndlovu, whom I consulted for context. “With millions of South Africans dependent on this support, any government that attempted to end it would face enormous electoral consequences.”
Beyond electoral politics, the extension represents an important step in South Africa’s ongoing debate about implementing a more comprehensive Basic Income Grant (BIG). Many social development experts view the SRD grant as a precursor to a more substantial and permanent support system.
“The SRD grant has effectively become a pilot for a Basic Income Grant,” explains Dr. Nomonde Tshabalala, a social policy researcher at the University of the Witwatersrand. “It has demonstrated both the feasibility of delivering cash transfers to millions of previously excluded people and the limitations of the current approach in terms of adequacy and coverage.”
Government officials have increasingly framed the SRD grant in these terms, with Minister Zulu referring to it as “a stepping stone toward a more comprehensive social security framework” during her announcement.
The two-year extension provides a window for policymakers to finalize plans for a potential transition to a more permanent system. A government technical committee is currently exploring funding models and implementation frameworks for a Basic Income Grant, with recommendations expected by late 2024.
Implementation Challenges Ahead
Despite the welcomed certainty the extension provides, significant implementation challenges remain for SASSA.
The agency has struggled with technical issues throughout the SRD grant’s existence, from website crashes during application periods to payment system failures. The new staggered payment system aims to address some of these issues, but questions remain about SASSA’s technical capacity to manage the program effectively over the extended timeframe.
During a recent parliamentary oversight committee meeting, SASSA officials acknowledged ongoing challenges with their database integration, which has led to some eligible recipients being incorrectly disqualified based on outdated or erroneous information.
“We continue to improve our systems and data matching processes,” Memela-Khambula told the committee. “But we recognize that there have been errors that have unfairly excluded some eligible recipients.”
The appeals process for rejected applications remains problematic, with significant backlogs and unclear communication. During my visits to SASSA offices, I encountered numerous individuals who had been trying to resolve appeals for months without resolution.
One such person was Michael Zwane, 34, who had been visiting the Khayelitsha office weekly for three months. “My application was rejected because they said I have another source of income, but that’s not true,” he explained, visibly frustrated. “Every time I come here, they tell me to wait or check online, but nothing changes. Meanwhile, I have no income at all.”
SASSA has promised improvements to the appeals system as part of the extension, including faster processing times and better communication with applicants. However, similar promises in the past have often failed to materialize in practice.
Community Support Systems
One of the most remarkable aspects of the SRD grant program has been the community support systems that have developed around it. In the face of the grant’s limitations, communities have created mutual aid networks that help recipients maximize the value of their payments.
In Diepsloot, northwest of Johannesburg, I visited a community kitchen where SRD grant recipients pool a small portion of their grants to create a food service that operates during the final week of each month – typically when individual food supplies run low.
“We call it the ‘Month-End Kitchen,'” explains Margaret Mulenga, who coordinates the initiative. “Each participant contributes R20 from their grant, and we cook large, nutritious pots of food that feed about 150 people daily during that difficult final week. It’s much more efficient than everyone trying to make their small amount of food stretch individually.”
Similar cooperative arrangements exist around bulk purchasing, shared transport to collection points, and even rotating savings clubs where members take turns receiving the pooled grants to make larger necessary purchases.
These community innovations represent inspiring examples of resilience but also highlight the fundamental inadequacy of the current grant amount. They are necessary adaptations to a support system that provides only partial solutions to deep poverty.
Looking Forward: Recipients’ Perspectives
As the sun climbs higher in the sky outside the Khayelitsha SASSA office, the queue has barely diminished. New arrivals continue to join the back of the line, many having traveled from rural areas at considerable expense just to check their grant status in person.
For Nomvula, whom I met at dawn, the extension brings a measure of relief but not an end to her struggles. “Two more years of support is better than uncertainty,” she says as she finally exits the office, having confirmed her grant is active. “But what happens after 2026? And how do we really build lives on R370 a month? These are the questions I still worry about.”
Her sentiment reflects the complex reality of the SRD grant extension – a necessary intervention that provides critical support to millions of vulnerable South Africans, yet falls far short of addressing the structural poverty and unemployment that necessitate such support in the first place.
As South Africa continues to grapple with these fundamental challenges, the extension of the SRD grant until March 2026 represents an important acknowledgment of ongoing hardship and the government’s responsibility to provide support. For recipients like Nomvula, Thabo, Joyce, and millions of others, it means two more years of modest but vital assistance as they navigate the daily struggle to survive and, hopefully, build more sustainable futures.
Also Read –
How To Apply and Receive The SASSA SRD Grant For March 2025