The morning queue outside the SASSA office in Khayelitsha stretches for nearly half a kilometer. I arrived at 6:15 AM to speak with grant recipients, and some had been waiting since 4 AM. Nomvula Mbeki, a 43-year-old mother of two, shields her eyes from the early autumn sun as she explains her situation.
“I’ve been receiving the SRD grant since 2020, but last month my payment didn’t come. Nobody can tell me why,” she says, shifting her weight from one foot to another. “I’m hoping today someone can explain what happened.”
Nomvula is one of nearly 8.5 million South Africans relying on the Social Relief of Distress (SRD) grant, a program initially introduced as a temporary measure during the COVID-19 pandemic that has since evolved into a semi-permanent social security mechanism. As March 2025 begins, significant changes to the grant’s implementation, verification processes, and payment schedules are causing both hope and anxiety among recipients.
This comprehensive guide breaks down everything recipients need to know about the SASSA SRD grant for March 2025, from payment dates to policy changes, application procedures, and the real-world impact on the country’s most vulnerable citizens.
March 2025 Payment Schedule: Key Dates and Changes
SASSA has implemented a new payment schedule for March 2025, continuing the staggered approach based on the last three digits of recipients’ ID numbers:
- 1st-3rd March: ID numbers ending in 000-034
- 4th-6th March: ID numbers ending in 035-069
- 7th-10th March: ID numbers ending in 070-104
- 11th-13th March: ID numbers ending in 105-139
- 14th-17th March: ID numbers ending in 140-174
- 18th-20th March: ID numbers ending in 175-209
- 21st-24th March: ID numbers ending in 210-244
- 25th-27th March: ID numbers ending in 245-279
- 28th-31st March: ID numbers ending in 280-999
This staggered approach represents a shift from previous years when payments were often processed in larger batches, leading to system overloads and delays. According to SASSA spokesperson Paseka Letsatsi, whom I interviewed via telephone last week, the more granular schedule aims to reduce pressure on payment systems and allow for better troubleshooting of individual payment issues.
“By processing smaller batches more frequently, we can identify and resolve problems more quickly,” Letsatsi explained. “This should result in fewer missed payments and a more reliable system overall.”
For recipients who opt for bank transfers, funds should reflect in accounts on the first day of their allocated window. Those collecting cash payments from retail partners (including Pick n Pay, Shoprite, Boxer, and Checkers) or the Post Office can do so any time during their designated period, provided they have received the SMS confirmation that their grant is ready for collection.
The Current State of the SRD Grant
As of March 2025, the SRD grant remains set at R370 per month, following a modest increase from R350 in the 2024/2025 national budget. While this R20 increase was welcomed by recipients, advocacy groups continue to argue that it falls far short of addressing the impact of inflation on South Africa’s poorest citizens.
“The R370 grant now buys less than the R350 grant did when it was introduced in 2020,” notes economic researcher Dr. Thabo Manyathi of the University of Cape Town’s Poverty and Inequality Initiative. “Food inflation alone has eroded the value significantly, with basic foodstuff prices increasing by over 30% since the grant’s inception.”
For perspective, the current food poverty line in South Africa stands at R760 per person per month – more than double the SRD grant amount. This means that even with the grant, recipients typically cannot meet their basic nutritional needs without additional support.
Despite these limitations, the grant remains a crucial lifeline for millions. SASSA’s internal research, shared with me during my investigation, indicates that the SRD grant is the only source of income for approximately 52% of recipients, while another 31% combine it with informal or occasional employment.
The Verification Controversy
March 2025 marks the implementation of SASSA’s enhanced verification system, which has been a source of significant controversy. The new system includes more frequent cross-checking against banking records, tax data, and other government databases to ensure recipients meet the eligibility criteria.
While SASSA maintains these measures are necessary to prevent fraud, many recipients and advocacy organizations argue they create unnecessary barriers for legitimate beneficiaries.
Standing in the SASSA queue, Thabo Ndlovu, a 37-year-old former construction worker, shows me a series of text messages on his phone. “They keep asking me to verify my information, but when I follow the link, the system crashes,” he explains. “I’ve tried 23 times in the past week. If I don’t get through by tomorrow, they say my payment will be suspended.”
Thabo’s experience is not unique. The Black Sash, a social justice organization that monitors social grant implementation, has documented thousands of similar cases where technical issues with the verification system have resulted in payment suspensions for eligible recipients.
“The verification process has become a bureaucratic obstacle course,” says Thandiwe Zulu, Black Sash’s advocacy coordinator, during our meeting at their Cape Town office. “People living in digital poverty – without reliable internet access or digital literacy – are particularly disadvantaged. We’ve seen cases where eligible recipients lose their grants simply because they couldn’t navigate the technical verification requirements.”
SASSA has acknowledged these challenges but defends the enhanced verification as necessary to ensure the grant reaches its intended beneficiaries. According to Letsatsi, the agency is working to improve the system’s stability and has implemented measures to assist those struggling with the technical aspects.
“We’ve deployed additional staff to our offices and call centers specifically to help with verification issues,” he says. “We’re also exploring partnerships with community organizations to provide support in areas with limited connectivity.”
Application and Reapplication Process
For new applicants or those who need to reapply after a suspension, March 2025 brings some significant changes to the application process.
The most notable change is the introduction of a simplified reapplication pathway for previously approved recipients who were suspended due to verification issues. Rather than completing an entirely new application, these individuals can now use a streamlined process that requires only updating the information that needs correction.
New applications continue to be processed through the SASSA SRD website (srd.sassa.gov.za), WhatsApp line (082 046 8553), or USSD service (1347737#). In-person applications are also accepted at SASSA offices, though the agency strongly encourages digital applications to reduce queue times.
Joyce Sithole, a first-time applicant I met outside the SASSA office, described her experience with the application process: “I don’t have a smartphone, so I came to apply in person. I arrived at 5 AM and was given number 87 in the queue. The staff were helpful, but the system is very slow. They said it would take 10-15 working days to process my application.”
Application requirements remain largely unchanged, requiring:
- South African ID number
- Name and surname as they appear on the ID
- Gender and disability status
- Banking details (if available)
- Contact details (cell phone number)
- Residential address
SASSA officials emphasize that applicants must ensure their banking details are accurate, as incorrect information is one of the leading causes of payment failures. Recipients without bank accounts can still opt for cash collection methods.
Appeals Process for Rejected Applications
March 2025 also brings changes to the appeals process for rejected applications, with SASSA implementing a new two-tier system designed to resolve appeals more efficiently.
Under the new system, initial appeals undergo an automated review that checks the original rejection reason against updated database information. This first-tier review is completed within 48-72 hours, potentially leading to faster resolutions for straightforward cases.
If the automated review upholds the rejection, the appeal progresses to a second-tier review conducted by a human case worker. This more comprehensive review can take up to 30 days but allows for consideration of special circumstances not captured by the automated systems.
“The previous appeals process was simply too slow,” explains Letsatsi. “Some appeals were taking up to 90 days to resolve, leaving vulnerable people without support for months. The new two-tier system aims to resolve clear-cut cases quickly while still providing thorough review for more complex situations.”
For Andile Mathebula, who has been fighting a rejected application since January, the new process offers some hope. “They rejected me because they said I have another source of income, but that’s not true,” he tells me while waiting at the SASSA office. “I submitted my appeal three days ago, and they told me I should receive a response from the automated system tomorrow. I’m praying it works this time.”
Data provided by SASSA indicates that approximately 30% of appeals are successful, resulting in grant approval and back payment for the affected months. However, advocacy groups like the Black Sash suggest the success rate should be higher, arguing that many legitimate recipients are rejected due to database errors or overly rigid criteria interpretation.
The Human Impact: How Recipients Use the Grant
Beyond the administrative details, it’s important to understand how this modest grant affects recipients’ daily lives. During my visits to communities in Cape Town, Johannesburg, and rural Eastern Cape, I spoke with dozens of grant recipients about how they use their R370 monthly payment.
Patterns emerged quickly – the grant primarily goes toward basic food items, with recipients developing careful strategies to maximize its value despite its limitations.
Nolwazi Dlamini, a 52-year-old grandmother from Khayelitsha who cares for two grandchildren, explains her budgeting approach: “From the R370, I spend R200 on maize meal, beans, and oil – the basics that can stretch. Another R100 goes to electricity. The remaining R70 I try to save toward school shoes for my grandchildren, but often it goes to emergency medicine or transport.”
For younger recipients like Sipho Mbatha, a 26-year-old from Alexandra township in Johannesburg, the grant serves a different purpose: “I use about half for food, but the rest I save for data bundles so I can apply for jobs online and respond to employment opportunities. Without the grant, I couldn’t even search for work effectively.”
In rural areas, where food costs are often higher due to transport factors, the grant stretches even less far. Nonkululeko Radebe from a small village in the Eastern Cape describes pooling resources with neighbors: “Five of us contribute our grants together to buy in bulk from the monthly mobile market that comes to our area. We get better prices that way, and then share the food among our families.”
These stories highlight both the critical importance of the grant and its fundamental inadequacy. For most recipients, the R370 covers basic survival needs for only a portion of each month, requiring additional support from family networks, community associations, or sporadic informal work to survive.
The Political Context: Future of the Grant
March 2025 comes at a pivotal moment for the SRD grant politically. What began as a temporary emergency measure during the COVID-19 pandemic has been repeatedly extended but still lacks permanent statutory status. The current authorization extends through March 2026, but debates about the grant’s long-term future intensify as each extension approaches.
The grant exists in a political limbo – not permanent enough for recipients to feel secure, yet too established to be easily discontinued given the millions who depend on it. This uncertainty affects not only recipients but also SASSA’s ability to implement more efficient long-term systems.
Finance Minister Tsakani Maphunye addressed the grant’s future during the February 2025 budget speech: “The SRD grant continues to play a vital role in our social security framework while we work toward more comprehensive solutions. We remain committed to supporting the most vulnerable South Africans while developing pathways to sustainable livelihoods.”
This careful language reflects the competing pressures on government: fiscal constraints that make a substantial increase or permanent guarantee difficult, contrasted with the undeniable humanitarian need and political consequences of discontinuing support to millions of voters.
Social development experts increasingly view the SRD grant as a stepping stone toward a more comprehensive Basic Income Grant (BIG), which would provide more substantial and reliable support to working-age adults with no income.
“The SRD grant has essentially become a pilot program for a Basic Income Grant,” notes social policy researcher Dr. Nomonde Tshabalala from the University of the Witwatersrand. “It has demonstrated both the feasibility of delivering cash transfers to millions of previously excluded people and the limitations of the current approach. March 2025 represents a critical juncture as policymakers evaluate data from several years of implementation to inform the next phase of social protection reform.”
Community Support Systems
One of the most striking observations from my fieldwork was the elaborate support systems that have developed around the SRD grant. In the face of the grant’s limitations, communities have created mutual aid networks that help recipients maximize the value of their payments.
In Diepsloot, northwest of Johannesburg, I visited a community kitchen where SRD grant recipients pool a small portion of their grants to create a food service that operates during the final week of each month – typically when individual food supplies run low.
“We call it the ‘Month-End Kitchen,'” explains Margaret Mulenga, who coordinates the initiative. “Each participant contributes R20 from their grant, and we cook large, nutritious pots of food that feed about 150 people daily during that difficult final week. It’s much more efficient than everyone trying to make their small amount of food stretch individually.”
Similar cooperative arrangements exist around bulk purchasing, shared transport to collection points, and even rotating savings clubs where members take turns receiving the pooled grants to make larger necessary purchases.
These community innovations represent inspiring examples of resilience but also highlight the fundamental inadequacy of the current grant amount. They are necessary adaptations to a support system that provides only partial solutions to deep poverty.
Technology and Access Challenges
The increasing digitization of the SRD grant system – from application and verification to payment – creates both opportunities and challenges for recipients. March 2025’s enhanced verification processes particularly highlight the digital divide affecting many grant recipients.
During my fieldwork, I observed numerous challenges related to technology access. At a public library in Soweto, I met Bongani Ntuli, who travels 7 kilometers each way twice weekly to use the free internet facilities to check his grant status and respond to verification requests.
“I don’t have data for my phone, and network coverage is bad where I live anyway,” he explains while waiting for a computer. “If I miss a verification message, my payment gets suspended, so I come here every Monday and Thursday to check, even though the transport costs eat into the grant money.”
For older recipients and those in rural areas, technological barriers are even more significant. Many rely on younger family members or community volunteers to help them navigate digital requirements.
SASSA has acknowledged these challenges and introduced some mitigating measures for March 2025, including extended deadlines for verification responses in rural areas and a system that sends verification requests via SMS rather than requiring recipients to check the website regularly.
The Path Forward
As March 2025 unfolds, the SASSA SRD grant continues to be a study in contradictions – simultaneously essential yet insufficient, increasingly sophisticated in its systems yet often inaccessible to those who need it most, politically popular yet perpetually insecure in its long-term status.
For recipients like Nomvula, whom I met in the early morning queue, these policy discussions and system changes matter less than the immediate question of whether this month’s payment will arrive and how far it can be stretched.
“Politicians and officials talk about the future of the grant,” she says as her number is finally called after a five-hour wait. “But for us, it’s about today, about this month. Will my children eat properly this week? Can I keep the electricity on? These are my questions.”
As I leave the SASSA office in the early afternoon, the queue has barely diminished. New arrivals continue to join the back of the line, many having traveled from rural areas at considerable expense just to resolve issues with their grants in person. Their persistence is a testament to both the vital importance of the SRD grant and the significant challenges that remain in its implementation.
The March 2025 changes represent incremental improvements to a system that requires more fundamental reform. Until that comes, millions of South Africans will continue to depend on their R370 monthly payment – planning carefully, pooling resources where possible, and demonstrating remarkable resilience in the face of ongoing hardship.
Also Read –
Court Ruling Ensures Increase In SASSA SRD Grant With New Eligibility And Application Process