The morning air still carries a slight chill as Gogo Nomsa Khumalo, 76, settles onto her plastic chair, carefully placing her walking stick against her leg. It’s 5:30 AM outside the SASSA office in Kimberley, Northern Cape, and she’s already been waiting for an hour. Around her, the queue grows steadily, a human chain of mostly elderly people clutching their soon-to-be-obsolete gold SASSA cards and manila folders containing their identity documents.
“My neighbor’s daughter brought me here yesterday, but we were turned away because there were too many people,” she explains, adjusting her headscarf. “Today she dropped me very early before going to work. I must get this new card. They say if I don’t, my pension won’t come next month.”
Gogo Khumalo is one of thousands of South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) beneficiaries racing against time to switch their gold payment cards to the new Postbank black cards before the March 20 deadline. After this date, the gold cards—which have been the lifeline delivering social grants to millions of South Africa’s most vulnerable citizens—will stop working entirely.
The Final Countdown
The South African Post Office (SAPO) and Postbank have been urging SASSA beneficiaries since January to make the switch, but with just days remaining before the deadline, long queues and confusion persist across the country, particularly in rural and outlying areas where information dissemination has been spotty at best.
“We’re working extended hours to accommodate as many clients as possible,” says Thabo Mokgola, a Postbank spokesperson, gesturing toward the growing line in Kimberley. “The transition is necessary as we upgrade our systems to provide better service and security, but we recognize it hasn’t been without challenges.”
The gold cards, introduced several years ago as part of SASSA’s payment solution, were originally meant to simplify the grant payment process. Now, beneficiaries must transition to the new Postbank black cards or choose alternative payment methods, such as having their grants paid directly into personal bank accounts.
For many recipients, however, the process has been anything but simple.
The Human Impact
Forty kilometers outside Kimberley, in the small community of Ritchie, 62-year-old Joseph Modise leans against the wall of the local post office, which operates card services only two days a week. He’s traveled here by minibus taxi, spending R60 of his precious grant money on transport.
“This is my third time coming here,” he says, frustration evident in his voice. “The first time, their system was down. The second time, they closed early. Today I pray it works because the deadline is coming, and I cannot live without my disability grant.”
Modise lost his right leg in a mining accident fifteen years ago. The disability grant he receives is his only income, supporting not just himself but also his unemployed daughter and two grandchildren.
“If this money stops, we don’t eat. It’s that simple,” he says, tapping his prosthetic leg nervously. “Why must it be so difficult? We are not asking for extra money, just to receive what the government already promised us.”
His experience reflects a broader concern among beneficiaries: the practical challenges of making the switch are amplified by the dire consequences of failing to do so. For South Africa’s poor, many of whom live hand-to-mouth, missing even a single grant payment can trigger a crisis cascade—rent unpaid, medication unbought, school fees in arrears, and empty plates at the dinner table.
System Strains and Responses
The pressure on the system is showing. At the Kimberley Post Office branch, a staff member who requested anonymity admits they’re overwhelmed.
“We’re processing four times our normal volume, but with the same staff and resources,” she says during a brief break. “The system crashes regularly under the load. We try to explain to people why they need to wait or come back, but it’s hard when you’re facing someone who’s traveled far and spent money they can’t afford to be here.”
Postbank has deployed mobile units to some remote areas and established temporary service points in community halls and municipal buildings to ease the burden on permanent facilities. However, coverage remains inconsistent, with many rural beneficiaries reporting they haven’t seen these services in their communities.
In response to growing concerns about beneficiaries missing the deadline, SASSA and Postbank officials have sought to reassure the public.
“While March 20 remains our target date, we want to assure beneficiaries that no one will go without their grants,” says Regional Executive Manager for SASSA in the Northern Cape, Zoleka Xabendlini. “If some beneficiaries are unable to switch before the deadline despite their best efforts, we have contingency measures in place.”
These contingencies, however, come with their own challenges. Beneficiaries who miss the card switch deadline will need to either open a personal bank account or collect their grants in cash at designated points—options that may present new obstacles for elderly or disabled recipients with limited mobility or financial literacy.
The Elderly Burden
For elderly beneficiaries, the card switch process has been particularly taxing. Many report confusion about the requirements and procedure.
At 81, Daniel Diphoko relies on his old age pension to support himself in his modest home in Galeshewe township. His hands shake slightly as he unfolds and refolds his ID document, waiting for his turn at the service counter.
“I don’t understand why we need new cards again,” he says. “Every few years, it’s a new system, new cards, new problems. At my age, I just want things to work without all this changing.”
Beside him, his neighbor’s granddaughter, Tshepiso, who accompanied him to help navigate the process, explains the additional burden these administrative changes place on multi-generational households.
“I took unpaid leave today to bring my grandfather,” she says. “Many old people can’t do this alone—they need someone to help with transport, with standing in line, with understanding the forms. But who helps the gogos who live alone or whose families work far away?”
This generational support system is evident throughout the queue. Young adults accompany elderly relatives, sometimes taking shifts so that family members can rotate between work obligations and assisting their elders. It’s an invisible tax on families already stretched thin by economic pressures.
Rural Realities
The challenges are amplified in rural areas, where distances are greater, transportation is scarcer, and information often arrives late if at all.
In Warrenton, about 70 kilometers from Kimberley, 57-year-old Sarah Motlhaping describes the ripple effects of the card switch process on her community.
“In my village, the post office is only open three days a week, and when the electricity goes out, which happens often, they can’t help anyone,” she explains. “People save taxi money for days to come to town, only to be told to come back another time. How many trips can a poor person afford to make?”
Community-based organizations have stepped in to fill gaps where possible. The Warrenton Elderly Care Association has organized shared transport for grant recipients, pooling resources to rent minibuses that can take multiple beneficiaries to Postbank facilities.
“We saw our members struggling and knew we had to do something,” says association chairperson Mmapula Setlhodi. “But it’s not a perfect solution. Some people are too frail for these journeys. Others live too far from our pickup points. The system should come to the people, not expect the people—especially the vulnerable—to chase the system.”
Information Gaps
A recurring theme in conversations with beneficiaries is the inconsistent communication about the card switch process. While urban areas have benefited from radio announcements and newspaper coverage, information penetration in rural communities has been spotty.
“I only heard about this deadline last week when my neighbor told me,” says 66-year-old Martha Dikgale from Barkly West. “No one from SASSA came to explain. There was nothing at the pay point where I usually collect my grant. If my neighbor hadn’t told me, what would have happened to my money?”
SASSA officials acknowledge communication challenges but point to resource constraints that limit their outreach capacity.
“We’ve utilized all available channels, including community radio, SMS notifications to registered beneficiaries, and partnerships with traditional authorities in rural areas,” says a SASSA communications officer. “But we recognize that in a country as diverse as ours, with eleven official languages and varying levels of connectivity, no single communication strategy reaches everyone.”
This gap highlights a broader issue in service delivery to vulnerable populations: systems designed primarily for efficiency often fail to account for the realities of those they’re meant to serve, particularly in a country with South Africa’s pronounced urban-rural divide and digital inequality.
Banking Barriers
For some beneficiaries, the suggested alternative—having grants paid directly into personal bank accounts—presents its own set of challenges.
Dikeledi Molefe, 48, a disability grant recipient from Ritchie, explains her hesitation.
“The bank charges fees for everything—if you withdraw, if you check your balance, if you use another bank’s ATM,” she says. “These fees eat into our grants. The SASSA card didn’t have these charges. Plus, the nearest ATM to my house is often empty on grant days because so many people are drawing cash.”
Financial inclusion experts note that while banking penetration has improved in South Africa, meaningful access involves more than simply having an account.
“True financial inclusion means appropriate, affordable services that meet people’s needs,” explains economist Dr. Lebohang Pheko. “For many grant recipients, especially those in rural areas or with limited literacy, conventional banking remains inaccessible not just physically but functionally. The costs, the complexity, and the customer service often fail to serve this segment adequately.”
Looking Forward
As the deadline approaches, the pressure intensifies both on beneficiaries rushing to comply and on the systems trying to accommodate them.
Back in the Kimberley queue, Gogo Nomsa Khumalo has finally reached the front after nearly five hours of waiting. Her relief at receiving her new black card is palpable.
“Now I can rest easy,” she says, carefully placing the card in her purse. “My grandchildren will eat next month.”
For Joseph Modise in Ritchie, the outcome is less positive. After waiting all day, he’s been told to return tomorrow due to system issues.
“I will come back because I have no choice,” he says wearily. “But it shouldn’t be this way. We who depend on these grants are not asking for luxury, just for dignity and for systems that work reliably.”
As South Africa continues its efforts to modernize social support systems, the current transition highlights both progress and persistent gaps. While technological upgrades promise enhanced security and efficiency in the long run, the implementation path reveals the distance still to travel in creating truly inclusive systems that serve all citizens—particularly those most dependent on them.
For now, as the March 20 deadline looms, the focus remains on ensuring that no eligible beneficiary loses access to their lifeline grants because of administrative hurdles. The success of this transition will be measured not in cards issued, but in lives sustained without disruption.
Also Read –
SASSA’s Festival Relief Updates And Early Payment Options For 2025