The morning sun slants through the smudged windows of Courtroom E at the Pretoria Specialised Commercial Crimes Court, casting long rectangles of light across the worn wooden benches. The air conditioning struggles against the late summer heat, and the gallery is unusually full for a Monday morning. Journalists squeeze together on the back benches, notebooks ready. Family members of the accused sit rigidly in the middle rows, their faces carefully composed. In the front, a row of suited lawyers arrange documents on their laps, occasionally leaning to whisper to one another.
At exactly 9:15 AM, a side door opens and the accused file in—eleven former South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) officials, once entrusted with distributing social grants to South Africa’s most vulnerable citizens. Now they face a staggering array of charges in what prosecutors are calling one of the most extensive fraud schemes in the agency’s history.
“All rise,” calls the court orderly, and the room shuffles to its feet as Magistrate Desmond Nair enters. What follows is a day of legal proceedings that reveals the growing magnitude of a case that has sent shockwaves through South Africa’s social development sector.
The Expanding Case
What began last year as an investigation into financial irregularities at several SASSA offices has ballooned into a criminal case involving more than R255 million in fraudulent social grant payments and over 1,300 criminal counts against the accused.
“The state wishes to amend the charge sheet to include an additional 437 counts of fraud, money laundering, and contravention of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act,” announces state prosecutor Advocate Mukhuli Ndamase, his voice steady as he addresses the court. “Our ongoing investigation has uncovered additional transactions and beneficiaries previously unknown to the prosecution.”
The accused—seven women and four men ranging in age from 34 to 57—maintain impassive expressions as the prosecutor details how they allegedly orchestrated a scheme to create thousands of ghost beneficiaries, diverting millions in social grant funds to personal accounts over a period spanning almost six years.
Lead investigator Captain Themba Mokwena of the Hawks’ Serious Commercial Crime Investigation unit tells journalists during the lunch break that the case grows more complex with each layer they uncover.
“What we initially thought was isolated fraud at a few branches has revealed itself to be a sophisticated network operating across multiple provinces,” Mokwena explains, the fatigue evident in his eyes. “We’ve traced money flowing through more than 200 bank accounts. Some dormant accounts were reactivated specifically for this scheme. Others belonged to deceased persons whose identities were being used to claim grants.”
The Anatomy of the Fraud
According to the charge sheet, the fraud operated through multiple sophisticated mechanisms:
In the primary scheme, the officials allegedly created thousands of fake beneficiaries by using a combination of deceased persons’ identities, fabricated medical assessments for disability grants, and manipulation of the SASSA system to override verification protocols.
“They knew exactly where the system vulnerabilities were,” explains a former SASSA IT specialist who asked not to be named. “They exploited a flaw in the verification process that allowed them to push through applications without triggering the usual cross-checks with Home Affairs databases.”
In another variation, legitimate beneficiaries would have their grant amounts inflated in the system, with the officials pocketing the difference. Many victims never realized they were receiving less than their entitled amount.
Perhaps most disturbing were cases where officials targeted actual grant recipients—often elderly or disabled persons with limited education or digital literacy—convincing them to surrender their SASSA cards and PINs under various pretexts.
Seventy-three-year-old Miriam Nkosi from Soshanguve recalls being approached by a “very kind” woman who identified herself as a SASSA official.
“She told me there was a problem with my card and she needed to fix it,” Nkosi says, her weathered hands nervously smoothing her dress as she recounts the experience. “She was so professional, with an ID card and everything. I gave her my card and my PIN. For three months after that, I received only half my pension. When I went to the office to complain, they said I had been withdrawing the full amount each month.”
Nkosi is one of more than 5,000 victims identified so far in the case. The elderly woman now makes the long journey to the SASSA office in person each month to collect her pension, unwilling to trust the card system again.
The Human Cost
The true victims of this fraud aren’t just numbers on a balance sheet. They are South Africa’s most vulnerable citizens—pensioners, disability grant recipients, child support beneficiaries, and indigent families who rely on social grants as their only lifeline.
In the township of Mamelodi East, community worker Thabo Legodi has seen firsthand the devastation caused by interrupted or stolen grants.
“When these grants don’t come through, people don’t eat,” he says bluntly, standing outside the local SASSA office where a long queue of beneficiaries stretches around the block. “We’ve had grandmothers who couldn’t buy their blood pressure medication. Children who had to drop out of school because there was no money for uniforms or transport. Some families have been evicted because they couldn’t pay rent.”
Social Development Minister Lindiwe Zulu, speaking at an unrelated event in Cape Town, called the fraud “a betrayal of the worst kind.”
“These were trusted officials who knew exactly who they were stealing from—not from faceless government coffers, but directly from the plates of the hungry, from the medicine cabinets of the ill, from the school fees of children,” Minister Zulu stated. “Each rand stolen represents food, medicine, school shoes, and dignity stolen from those who can least afford such losses.”
Inside the Scheme
Court documents reveal a complex operation that grew more sophisticated over time.
According to the prosecution, the scheme began in 2016 when a senior systems administrator at SASSA’s Pretoria office discovered a way to create and approve grant applications without triggering normal verification protocols. This official, now the first accused, allegedly recruited colleagues from various departments to expand the operation.
The fraud allegedly worked through a careful division of labor. Some officials would identify potential “ghost beneficiaries” by accessing deceased estate records or targeting vulnerable existing recipients. Others would create and approve the fraudulent applications in the system. A third group managed the financial side—opening bank accounts, handling withdrawals, and distributing proceeds among the network.
“The level of organization suggests this wasn’t opportunistic theft,” notes forensic investigator Fanie van Wyk, who has worked on several government fraud cases but is not involved in this particular investigation. “The systematic approach, the compartmentalization of tasks, the careful selection of victims unlikely or unable to report discrepancies—these are hallmarks of planned, organized crime.”
What makes the case particularly disturbing is how long it continued undetected. According to the charge sheet, the fraud operated from January 2016 until November 2022—nearly seven years during which millions were diverted monthly from intended beneficiaries.
Following the Money
The financial trail has led investigators across South Africa and beyond.
“We’ve traced funds to property purchases in four provinces, luxury vehicle acquisitions, and even foreign investments,” says Captain Mokwena. “One accused had purchased seven properties in five years on a salary that could never have supported such acquisitions.”
Bank records included in the court documents show a pattern of regular withdrawals, typically broken into smaller amounts to avoid triggering banking monitoring systems. The money would then be layered through multiple accounts before being used for purchases or investments.
The prosecution alleges that approximately R73 million was spent on real estate, R47 million on vehicles, R22 million on luxury goods, and the remainder distributed through cash withdrawals and transfers to associates.
Outside the courtroom, Asset Forfeiture Unit head Advocate Simon Matsapola confirms that his unit has already obtained preservation orders for 32 properties, 41 vehicles, and multiple bank accounts.
“We are committed to recovering every cent possible,” Matsapola states firmly. “Where we find assets purchased with proceeds of this crime, we will seize them. The victims of this fraud—South Africa’s poor and vulnerable—deserve nothing less than complete recovery of what was stolen from them.”
Systemic Failures
The case has raised serious questions about oversight and controls within SASSA, the agency responsible for distributing social grants to over 18 million South Africans monthly.
Internal whistleblower Nomusa Khumalo, who worked in SASSA’s compliance department until 2022, claims she flagged suspicious patterns as early as 2019 but was ignored.
“I noticed that certain offices had abnormally high rates of new disability grant approvals,” Khumalo explains in a coffee shop far from her former workplace. She speaks quietly, still fearful of repercussions despite no longer working for the agency. “When I investigated, I found that the medical assessments all came from the same three doctors. The documentation looked similar, as if copied and pasted with just the names changed. I reported this up the chain, but nothing happened.”
SASSA has since implemented additional verification protocols and audit mechanisms, but critics argue these measures come too late.
“The question we must ask is how this fraud continued for so many years without detection,” says social development policy analyst Dr. Rebecca Mthembu. “This points to serious failures not just by individuals but in the control systems that should have prevented such large-scale theft in the first place.”
Broader Implications
The case comes at a particularly sensitive time for South Africa’s social grant system, which is already under strain from economic pressures and increasing demand.
Social grants represent a critical safety net in a country with one of the world’s highest unemployment rates. Approximately one-third of South Africans receive some form of social grant, with this support forming the only income for many households.
“Every rand stolen from the social grant system is stolen from someone who has no alternative,” explains economist Dr. Thabo Mokoena. “Unlike tax fraud or other financial crimes where the impact is diffused, social grant fraud has direct, immediate consequences for people already living on the margins.”
The fraud also threatens to undermine public trust in a system that millions depend on.
In Diepsloot township, grant recipient Agnes Sithole expresses the sentiments of many: “How can we trust SASSA now? Every month I worry my grant won’t come, that someone inside has stolen it. This is our money, given by the government to help us survive. How could they steal from the poorest people?”
Legal Proceedings
As the day’s court proceedings conclude, Magistrate Nair confirms the additional charges will be added to the charge sheet. The case is postponed for three months to allow the defense to review the new evidence—thousands of pages of bank statements, property records, and electronic communications.
Defense attorney Advocate James Matlapeng, representing three of the accused, protests the delay. “My clients have been suspended without pay for over a year already. These continuous postponements amount to punishment before conviction.”
The magistrate is unmoved. “The complexity of this case and the seriousness of the charges necessitate thorough preparation by all parties,” he rules. “The interests of justice require that both prosecution and defense have adequate time to prepare.”
For the accused, who maintain their innocence through their legal representatives, the postponement means more uncertainty. For the thousands of victims, it means longer to wait for justice and potential restitution.
The Way Forward
As the case proceeds through the legal system, government and civil society are grappling with the broader implications.
SASSA has announced a comprehensive system review and has engaged international forensic experts to strengthen controls. The agency has also established a dedicated hotline for beneficiaries to report irregularities in their grant payments.
“We are determined to rebuild trust,” says newly appointed SASSA CEO, Busisiwe Memela-Khambula. “This fraud was a profound betrayal of our mandate, but it does not define the thousands of honest SASSA employees who work tirelessly to serve grant recipients.”
Civil society organizations are pushing for more radical reforms, including greater transparency and independent oversight of the social grant system.
“Self-regulation has clearly failed,” argues Black Sash national director Lynette Maart. “We need independent oversight with real authority to investigate and act on irregularities. The burden cannot fall on vulnerable grant recipients to detect and report fraud.”
As the sun sets on the courthouse, the accused are led back to the holding cells. They will return to face justice in three months, but for the thousands of victims—many of whom will queue at SASSA offices across the country tomorrow morning—the impact of their alleged crimes continues to reverberate through empty cupboards, unpaid school fees, and the gnawing anxiety of financial insecurity.
In the words of pensioner Johannes Mabaso, who discovered his grant had been reduced for several months without explanation: “They stole more than money. They stole our peace of mind, our trust in the government that is supposed to protect us. How do you get that back?”
Also Read –
SASSA’s Festival Relief Updates And Early Payment Options For 2025